It is a virtual certainty that when actors from the Philadelphia Eagles and New England Patriots line up on opposite sides of the field ahead of Sunday’s Super Bowl LII in Minneapolis, Minnesota , none of them will stoop, invoke a fist or dissent in any other fashion.

This is, in part, a product of context: No Patriots player affirmed all season, and none of the teams that still had demonstrating musicians at the end of the NFL’s regular season managed to make the playoffs. It is, in another account of incidents, a clue of a win won by the players on behalf of the affairs of ethnic justice and oppression their demonstrates had sought to highlight: The Eagles’ Malcolm Jenkins, who for often of the 2017 season invoked his fist during the course of its playing of the national chant, agreed to halt his declarations after impressing a contentious deal with the NFL whereby the league will spew millions of dollars into various social and racial justice-oriented campaigns.

And yet, the dissents that started with former San Francisco 49 ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick in 2016 will be notably missing from football’s main event, another introduction in its own history of black athletes’ protest and the freighted omissions it creates.

This was, as HuffPost columnist Jamil Smith wrote this week, the “blackest year in NFL history” — a season defined by Kaepernick’s lack of a contract and claims that “hes been” blackballed. A season defined by the continuation of the asserts he began and by President Donald Trump’s repeated criticizes on the “son of a bitch” players who spoke out against America’s racism and his own. A season defined by the NFL’s doddering responses that, at every turn, were geared more toward halting the asserts by any means necessary to appease the uneasy white members of its gathering than understanding the protests’ intent or their significance.

This was the season the underlying dynamic of the athletic, and of professional plays in general, was laid bare: Black humanities make up some three-quarters of the participants in a league that manipulates their strive for the leisure of principally white supporters and the improvement of largely grey owners. Which is why, when a pitch-black athlete removes himself from the normal proceedings of American plays, or when he is removed by force or by silent ordinance, a charged room models. Kaepernick, Craig Hodges, Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, the Wyoming Black 14 — the histories of black fermentation in sports is the story of profound absences.

And so, at Super Bowl LII , notwithstanding Monday night’s Black Lives Matter protest in St. Paul, the NFL’s blackest time will end with the absence of agitation itself.

The last-place term Minneapolis hosted a Super Bowl, in 1992, a series of protests against the Washington Redskins, who won that tournament, touched off the modern explanation of the movement against the team’s prejudiced call. A prosecution against the team’s mark protections followed later that year; exclusively this past tumble did a second copy of that clothing drop-off at the entrusts of the Supreme Court.

The NFL and Washington’s owner have remained intransigent in the face of persisted opposition to that epithet. The tournament has argued for more than two decades now that “Redskins” is not a “dictionary-defined ethnic insinuation, ” as Native American groups say, but a token of “honor” and “respect” — beckoning apart any suggestion that the stereotyping of Native Americans might exacerbate the inequalities and inconsistencies they face in a country that for centuries has tried to eradicate them.

Perhaps, as Jenkins suggested after his splintered Musician Coalition reached its deal with the NFL, the conference will be more forthcoming and less contemptuous in its efforts to help its black musicians address the problems they and their home communities still face.

But there are reasons to share in the agnosticism experienced by participates like 49 ers safety Eric Reid, one of the first to affiliate Kaepernick’s protest. Reid split with Jenkins and the Players Coalition over what he saw as a consider symbolize merely to put a stop to the protests.

The NFL’s brass has long interpreted its conference as segregated from America’s problems, a bastion of solidarity that washes above the political and social issues that fraction and characterize us.

Last year, ahead of Super Bowl LI in Houston — home to millions of Latino immigrants and more refugees than any other municipal in home countries — reporters peppered NFL commissioner Roger Goodell with questions about Trump’s attempts to ban refugees from sure-fire majority-Muslim countries. They asked about his plans to build a wall along the Mexican mete. Goodell demurred, pointing back to the ideals of unification, supposing that the NFL is an inherently apolitical institution.

This is a lie, of course. The NFL owes its existence as a multibillion-dollar corporation to politics and political activism, and it is slew willing to engage in the sort of politics that boost its bottom line: It stymies jolt experiment; it zealously follows taxpayer funded for field construction; it lobbies for advantageous charge and antitrust management in Congress. And it continuously wraps itself in Americana, patriotism and militarism to pander to the white-hot kinfolks it sees as its primary fan cornerstone.

But these are the politics of self-preservation and self-enrichment, and they work best when paired with a enraged reaction against any effort to change the status quo. The words of the protest musicians are distorted as somehow offensive to the military, or as a model of “reverse racism.” Athletes and plays commentators are was necessary to “stick to sports.” Trump has mobilized the lily-white backfire to the demonstrations. Now still others, more: This week, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster( R) problem a proclamation calling on the state’s tenants to sit during the hymn before the Super Bowl.

NFL owners — many of whom financially supported Trump — were enthusiastic adopters of the disagreement that the protests from Kaepernick, Jenkins and dozens of other participates had turned off white-hot fans. And so under the pretense of Goodell’s oft-stated mantra of protecting “the shield” — a metonym alluding to the league’s heraldic typify — they sought to end the rallies in an effort to keep the depict exiting and the dollars flowing.

So even if the tournament is sincere in its efforts to partner with the Player Coalition, it is surely thrilled that the demoes won’t continue Sunday night, that nothing will disconcert followers, or patronizes, or media, or anyone else from the sight at hand.

Read more: http :// www.huffingtonpost.com /~ ATAGEND